sport

Video | Clattenburg resolves the controversy over Al-Ahly’s canceled goal against the Ministry of the Interior in the league

Video | Clattenburg resolves the controversy over Al-Ahly’s canceled goal against the Ministry of the Interior in the league

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Mark Clattenburg, Chairman of the Referees Committee, revealed of the Egyptian Football AssociationOn the validity of the arbitration decisions taken in the matches of Al-Ahly Bank, Ceramica Cleopatra and Al-Ahly against Al-Dakhiliya in the third round of the Egyptian League.

And the official page of the Egyptian Football Association published a video showing it Clattenburg Arbitration cases and their validity.

National Bank and Ceramica Cleopatra

Case 1: The referee awarded a penalty kick After the goalkeeper, defender and striker competed for the ball inside the penalty area, the video referee recommended a field review after which the referee changed his original decision to drop.

Clatenberg’s opinion: I agree with the VAR because the goalkeeper and striker were fair and normal contact between the players when competing for the ball and therefore the referee should have awarded a goal kick.

See also.. The Football Association resolves the controversy over the news of Clattenburg’s departure from the referees committee

Case 2: The referee awarded a goal, the video referee checked the possibility of an error during the attack phase and recommended a field review of the attacker’s fault against the defender before the goal was scored, the referee checked the situation and canceled the goal due to an error in favor of the defender.

Clatenberg’s opinion: I agree with the video referee because there was a mistake in favor of the defender that led to the goal being scored as the attacker’s hand hit the defender’s face, causing him an injury that stopped him from defending in the next stage of play.

Al-Ahly and Al-Dakhiliya match

Situation: The referee awarded a goal, the VAR checked for offside in the build-up phase and using technology disallowed the goal for offside.

Clatenberg’s opinion: I reviewed the important steps that the video referee should take and when reviewing offside, the first step was to fix the moment of the first touch of the ball from the attacker and that was correct, the next step was to fix the attacker’s point that is in an offside position and also the placement of the point above the attacker’s shoulder was correct because The last point of the body at which a goal can be scored, the last step is to fix the last point of the defender’s foot and this is done correctly.

Once the procedures are completed, the 3D computer makes the final decision of the intrusion which was valid in the presence of the intrusion violation.





#Video #Clattenburg #resolves #controversy #AlAhlys #canceled #goal #Ministry #Interior #league

Related Articles

Back to top button